I assume that some of the correspondents on the DxO fora are working photographers, and thus in NPS, CPS, SPS, etc., depending upon system/s being used. Due to firmware changes, even the testing of a production model may yield different results (digital bodies are computers that take images, not traditional mechanical cameras). However, once the raw (NEF) format/s are known (e.g., samples from a pre-production body), reverse engineering a raw intake converter becomes possible. For full support with full corrections, one needs to use a sample of production bodies and lenses, not just one sample due to manufacturing tolerances. But, of course, feel free to continue posting about support "delays"if you wish.Īlthough the specifics of the Z9 support release can be dropped for now, several comments should be noted. Perhaps now is a good time to drop this topic as it no longer serves any useful purpose other than allowing posters to vent their frustration. Support will be available in the next few weeks as indicated by. While it may be a little frustrating to wait longer for DxO to implement those modules than some of its competition, I believe that it’s worth the wait. One of the things that DxO is renowned for is the quality of its camera/lens support modules. Yes, I’m aware that both Adobe Camera Raw and Lightroom implemented support in December, as did Capture One. There are several other raw processors that either don’t currently support the z9 or have only implemented support very recently. It’s not clear whether ON1:Photo Raw 2022 supports the Z9 yet. Luminar Neo was just released last week with support for the Z9. If you are not able to do so you are not professional in my opinon, Sorry that is a lame excuse. Outside of IR images, it's pretty rare.I understand quality, but as a professional company that charges for its services, you should be able to get your hand on a Z9 before normal users. The standard profiles have more latitude for adjusting WB on IR files in Capture NX-D than in Lightroom, but a Custom Profile can allow me to achieve the look I want. I only use Nikon Capture NX-D to convert my images for a very small number of circumstances. Sometimes it is useful to move to an alternate program in your workflow for a particular look with a difficult image. You can achieve any look you want by modifying the settings. The default setting for Masking is 0 - which almost never is appropriate.Īll of these settings are starting points. The sharpening settings are the same for the Z6 and Z7 even though the sensors are different resolution - so one of them is not optimal. Some settings - such as sharpening - are a bit crude. Just because Nikon supplies these values and Adobe reads the values does not make them correct overall or correct for your image. So the default values will depend on which camera you are using. There are also default choices based on the XMP for the Detail panel and Lens Correction panel. Adobe is using more elements of that file - the Picture Control to choose the profile, as well as settings for exposure, highlights and shadows to account for Active D-Lighting. The RAW file has an embedded XMP file that can be used by software. More recently, Adobe began using more settings found in the Z6 and Z7 cameras. These settings don't provide every possible picture control choice, but they cover the main settings - Neutral, Standard, Vivid, etc. Lightroom provides Camera profiles that are camera specific default settings. You can also try out alternate settings (like Picture Controls) in an existing RAW file to try out different options. Some settings are the same in the camera and the software so you can make adjustments to those settings in post. The Nikon software programs - Capture NX-D and View NXi - both process the RAW file in a similar manner to the way the Nikon cameras process the file.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |